Read this.
Now you know why I’m upset.
Every year it’s always so much fun to talk about who will win what major award. But when the writers contradict themselves and alternate the criteria needed to win each year, debating the awards is no longer fun.
If you were too lazy to click that link up top, all it showed was how Fox Sports writer Jon Paul Morosi is judging the AL Cy Young Award the opposite way he did last year.
I tweeted my take on awards Friday: 
The Yankee U’s Matt Imbrogno disagreed, saying team success shouldn’t factor into either award. Obviously, there’s no right answer here because the writers change up what each award means every year.
Just out of curiosity, do you think the major awards should be based partially on team success?
